Pluralismo ontologico e ontologia della sostanza La critica di Putnam alla tesi quineana sull’indeterminatezza della traduzione
digital
![]() Article
€ 6.00
|
Ebook format Pdf readable on these devices:
|
|
The paper provides an interpretation of Putnam’s ontological pluralism as articulated in the Philosophical Papers and The Meaning and the Moral Sciences, with respect especially to Quine’s ontological relativity. The model-theoretic argument is usually taken to support an anti-realist ontological view analogous to Quine’s, on which determining the meaning of words univocally is impossible. Contrary to this view, the paper argues that Putnam’s criticism of the indeterminacy of translation shows that the rejection of metaphysical realism does not amount to an anti-realist view. Rather, Putnam proposes a ‘sophisitcated’ realism admitting of a plurality of equivalent and mutually irreducible descriptions of the same fact. The paper concludes by pointing out that the compatibility between ontological pluralism and realism is the result of a synthesis of Aristotelianism and Kantianism obtained thanks to the mediation of pragmatism.
keywordsOntological Pluralism, Realism, Indeterminacy of translation, Holism, PragmatismAuthor biographyantonio.lizzadri@unicatt.it |
Browse the archive
Online First Articles
Nicolai Hartmann e Alexius Meinong su apriorità e causalità
Note sul carteggio
Brunetto Latini Italian (Political) Theory?
Una «profezia» pericolosa Gaetano Sanseverino lettore di Spinoza
Brunetto Latini Italian (Political) Theory?
Una «profezia» pericolosa Gaetano Sanseverino lettore di Spinoza
Recent issues
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2020 - 3. Rethinking Objectivity: With and Beyond Kant
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2020 - 2. Ethica e Passions de l’âme Spinoza con e contro Descartes
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2020 - 1
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2020 - 2. Ethica e Passions de l’âme Spinoza con e contro Descartes
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2020 - 1