À rebours: dal Sofista a Parmenide. Platone tra «corrispondenza» e «identità»
digital
![]() Article
€ 6.00
|
Ebook format Pdf readable on these devices:
|
|
This paper aims to develop an answer to a twofold question: in the Sophist, what does the aporetic notion of falsehood amount to, from a theoretical point of view? And, consequently, how can be theoretically defined the concept of truth Plato is rejecting in order to provide a new account of truth (and falsehood)? The two questions are, in fact, deeply related. Thus, the strategy will be as follows: firstly, the Plato’s «not-being as difference» account employed to solve the «ontological falsehood» puzzle will be recalled and its consequences examined; secondly, an analysis of the correspondence theory of truth Plato seems to endorse in the Sophist will be provided; finally, a suggestion concerning the theoretical nature of Eleatic account of truth – i.e. the account Plato is questioning – will be made.
keywordsPlato, Sophist, Truth, Correspondence, IdentityAuthor biographyUniversità degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata”. Email: erminia.di.iulio@uniroma2.it |
Browse the archive
Online First Articles
Nicolai Hartmann e Alexius Meinong su apriorità e causalità
Note sul carteggio
Brunetto Latini Italian (Political) Theory?
Una «profezia» pericolosa Gaetano Sanseverino lettore di Spinoza
Brunetto Latini Italian (Political) Theory?
Una «profezia» pericolosa Gaetano Sanseverino lettore di Spinoza
Recent issues
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2020 - 3. Rethinking Objectivity: With and Beyond Kant
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2020 - 2. Ethica e Passions de l’âme Spinoza con e contro Descartes
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2020 - 1
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2020 - 2. Ethica e Passions de l’âme Spinoza con e contro Descartes
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2020 - 1