À rebours: dal Sofista a Parmenide. Platone tra «corrispondenza» e «identità»
|
newdigital
Article
€ 6.00
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Article |
Ebook format Pdf readable on these devices:
|
|
|
|
|
This paper aims to develop an answer to a twofold question: in the Sophist, what does the aporetic notion of falsehood amount to, from a theoretical point of view? And, consequently, how can be theoretically defined the concept of truth Plato is rejecting in order to provide a new account of truth (and falsehood)? The two questions are, in fact, deeply related. Thus, the strategy will be as follows: firstly, the Plato’s «not-being as difference» account employed to solve the «ontological falsehood» puzzle will be recalled and its consequences examined; secondly, an analysis of the correspondence theory of truth Plato seems to endorse in the Sophist will be provided; finally, a suggestion concerning the theoretical nature of Eleatic account of truth – i.e. the account Plato is questioning – will be made.
keywordsPlato, Sophist, Truth, Correspondence, IdentityAuthor biographyUniversità degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata”. Email: erminia.di.iulio@uniroma2.it |
Browse the archive
Online First Articles
«Il Dio non ha colpa» (Platone Repubblica X, 617 E 1-2)
I volti e le ragioni dell’infelicità umana
nella riflessione platonica
John Locke on the Human Soul the Way of Henry More
Crantor’s Influence on Roman Consolatory Tradition the Case of Cicero
John Locke on the Human Soul the Way of Henry More
Crantor’s Influence on Roman Consolatory Tradition the Case of Cicero
Recent issues
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2020 - 1
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2019 - 4. Franz Brentano The Origin and Originality of his Thought and School
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2019 - 3
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2019 - 4. Franz Brentano The Origin and Originality of his Thought and School
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2019 - 3
