Virgilio Melchiorre, pensatore dell’origine
digital
![]() Article
€ 6.00
|
Ebook format Pdf readable on these devices:
|
|
This contribution intends to briefly present Virgilio Melchiorre’s intense speculative path, tracing through the theme of ‘origin’ a possible coherent thread, aimed at uniting his multiple speculative interests. The starting and finishing point is in fact identified by him in the metaphysical place of consciousness. It is in fact the consciousness and its structural dimensions that have been densely investigated by him, imposing a journey backwards, towards the origin that is, where thinking begins and makes sense. Hence the phenomenological evidence: it is from the heart of the experience that the question about its meaning arises and it is this question that asks on what foundation of intelligibility it rests. The disturbing question, formulated by Leibniz and taken up by Heidegger: «Why is there something rather than nothing?» the Milanese philosopher also asks, convinced that the metaphysical gesture responds to the needs of knowing, as well as the expectations of doing.
keywordsVirgilio Melchiorre, Metaphysics of Origin, Personalised Anthropology, Ethics, Phenomenology of hopeAuthor biographypaola.ricci@unime.it |
Browse the archive
Online First Articles
Economics as a Moral Science: Menger vs. Keynes
Validità logica e pluralismo aletico: due problemi e un’unica soluzione
Esistenza, dialettica, valore nel pensiero di Giuseppe Cantillo
Validità logica e pluralismo aletico: due problemi e un’unica soluzione
Esistenza, dialettica, valore nel pensiero di Giuseppe Cantillo
Recent issues
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2020 - 4
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2020 - 3. Rethinking Objectivity: With and Beyond Kant
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2020 - 2. Ethica e Passions de l’âme Spinoza con e contro Descartes
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2020 - 3. Rethinking Objectivity: With and Beyond Kant
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2020 - 2. Ethica e Passions de l’âme Spinoza con e contro Descartes