Your browser does not support JavaScript!

Silence and miscommunication: kierkegaardian indirect discourse and Hamlet's errant ship

digital Silence and miscommunication: kierkegaardian indirect discourse and Hamlet's errant ship
Article
journal RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA
issue RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2013 - 3-4
title Silence and miscommunication: kierkegaardian indirect discourse and Hamlet's errant ship
author
publisher Vita e Pensiero
format Article | Pdf
online since 02-2014
issn 00356247 (print) | 18277926 (digital)
Write a comment for this product
€ 6.00

Ebook format Pdf readable on these devices:

We will attempt to address a single question: how does Anti-Climacus, Søren Kierkegaard’s pseudonym in Practice in Christianity, use indirect communication? Nominally, indirect communication is opposed to direct communication, the negation of direction communication, and Kierkegaard himself says this in the text. It is thus useful to first address direct communication and then, by via negativa, to return to Anti-Climacus’ particular use of indirect communication. The vehicle for this examination will be another famous Dane: Hamlet, Prince of Darkness. In particular, we will focus on the role that double reflection plays in the complicated
trajectory of the errant ship in that famous Shakespearian drama.

Keywords: Kierkegaard, Shakespeare, Hamlet, direct-indirect communication, double reflection


Pinterest