Sources mythologiques de l’Eros platonicien

digital

Article

Journal	RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA
Issue	RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEO-SCOLASTICA - 2021 - 3
Title	Sources mythologiques de l’Eros platonicien Mythological Sources of Platonic Eros
Author	André Lanoue
Publisher	Vita e Pensiero
Format	Article \| Pdf
Online da	10-2021
Doi	10.26350/001050_000288
Issn	0035-6247 (print) \| 1827-7926 (digital)
Write a comment for this product

€ 6.00

Ebook format Pdf readable on these devices:

Computer
with Software:
- Adobe PDF Reader
Android
iPhone/Ipad
with App:
- Adobe PDF Reader
E-Book Reader
Ibs Tolino
Kobo

Description Readers' comments
In this article I interpret the Platonic concept of Eros as exposed in the Symposium. As many modern interpretations focus almost exclusively on the interpersonal or ‘romantic’ meaning of Eros (in spite of Plato explicitly refuting such interpretations), I recall that the philosophical value of Eros is first and foremost ontological and has thus but little to do with interpersonal relationships. To demonstrate this, I show the ontological horizon of the preexisting tradition and its striking similarity with Plato’s own doctrine. I then go on to interpret Plato’s own text (Aristophanes’ and Diotima’s speeches) and show that it is compatible with the Aristotelian doxographic tradition which presents Plato’s oral teachings. This article thus aims at presenting Plato as the heir of a preexisting tradition and his Eros theory as ontological. It also shows the benefits of using the Aristotelian doxography for Platonic hermeneutics. keywords Plato, Symposium, Eros, Ontology, Metaphysics Author biography Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg. Email: a.lanoue@protonmail.com Enter a comment for Sources mythologiques de l’Eros platonicien

Description Readers' comments

In this article I interpret the Platonic concept of Eros as exposed in the Symposium. As many modern interpretations focus almost exclusively on the interpersonal or ‘romantic’ meaning of Eros (in spite of Plato explicitly refuting such interpretations), I recall that the philosophical value of Eros is first and foremost ontological and has thus but little to do with interpersonal relationships. To demonstrate this, I show the ontological horizon of the preexisting tradition and its striking similarity with Plato’s own doctrine. I then go on to interpret Plato’s own text (Aristophanes’ and Diotima’s speeches) and show that it is compatible with the Aristotelian doxographic tradition which presents Plato’s oral teachings. This article thus aims at presenting Plato as the heir of a preexisting tradition and his Eros theory as ontological. It also shows the benefits of using the Aristotelian doxography for Platonic hermeneutics.